Is Macquarie Bailing on Parking?

Share:

Is Macquarie Bailing on Parking?

Australia's Macquarie Bank is apparently backing off its position in the parking business. It has been reported that Macquarie Infrastructure Company, the portion of the bank that has been so famous buying off airport parking, toll roads, the Chicago Skyway(ok leasing some) and National Car Parks in the UK amongst others, may be letting these assets "go", or as one source told me, "throwing the keys at the bank and walking away." How else can you interpret this, a portion of an article reporting on the company's fourth quarter growth:

 
The analysis also resulted in a decision to pursue strategic alternatives with respect to MIC's airport parking business including a possible sale, debt restructuring or filing for bankruptcy protection. The Company has advised lenders to the airport parking business that it does not intend to provide the business with additional capital contributions other than a maximum of $12.0 million in obligations that it has guaranteed. Implementation of any of the strategic alternatives would have no impact on the continued operation or cash generation of any other of MIC's businesses.

 
I'm told that "strategic alternatives" is financial speak for "dumping the program". Hmmm I wonder if this has anything to do with NCP not having any presence at all at the Parkex show in the UK. They usually have the biggest booth in the place, but were nowhere to be found and the folks at their on street citation management operation were very tight lipped.

 
Sometimes when companies back out of a market they boost the asset by stopping spending. Not dropping a hundred thousand on a booth at the UK's major trade show might be the beginning.

 
Stay tuned

 
JVH

UPDATE:  I have done a tad of research and find that the NCP portion of the Macquarie portfoilo is owned by Macquarie European Infrastructure Fundand not the US MIC above. Therefore it may not be included in the concerns MIC expressed in its news release. In further reading of the release I found this little item:

It is unlikely that the Company's airport parking business will be able
to refinance its debt obligations that mature in 2009 as a result of the
continued erosion of revenue caused by the decline in the level of
commercial air travel. MIC has advised lenders to the airport parking
business that it does not intend to provide the business with additional
capital contributions other than a maximum of $12.0 million in
obligations in connection with certain interest rate swap obligations,
shuttle bus leases and one facility lease that it has guaranteed.

Does this fall under the adage that if you owe the bank $10,000 its your problem, but if you owe the bank $10, 000,000 its the bank's problem?


 

John Van Horn

John Van Horn

2 Responses

  1. parking problem is a future problem. We have to cope it squarely whether we like it or not. And it got to be start it NOW!
    HH, Jakarta.

  2. Thanks for your Information,
    This Information is very useful to us, I saw one website they provides Luton Airport Parking – Cheap luton airport car parking, only 500 metres from Luton Airport. check this site http://www.airportcarparkz.com for more info.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Only show results from:

Recent Posts

A Note from a Friend

I received this from John Clancy. Now retired, John worked in the technology side of the industry for decades. I don’t think this needs any

Read More »

Look out the Window

If there is any advice I can give it’s concerning the passing scene. “Look out the window.” Rather than listen to CNN or the New

Read More »

Archives

See all Blog Posts

Send message to



    We use cookies to monitor our website and support our customers. View our Privacy Policy