More on “Phantom Parking”


More on “Phantom Parking”

If you haven’t, read the post below first. Then read this one.

Since I live in the area, I went to Third Street in Los Angeles on Saturday and personally checked out the situation.

Sure enough, I was right. There is a ton of parking, empty within two blocks of the area in question. The problem is that it’s not available.  The residential areas are empty of cars due to a residential permit program."  I discovered that permits cost $22.50 a year. That’s not enough to cover the administrative costs of the program. But I digress

There are also a number of neighborhoods in the area with high density apartment parking. Some of the buildings have parking under them, others do not.  Now the buildings with parking also charge more for the apartments, usually about $150-$200, to pay for the cost of providing the parking space. People willingly pay the additional, and there is a waiting list for these units.

So let’s see.  If I’m able to get an apartment with a parking space, the cost if $200 a month, if not, the on street spaces cost me $22.50 a year.  Now that makes a lot of sense.

Back to the original problem. The city, in its infinite wisdom, and I’m sure to keep voters who live in apartments and in the tony neighborhoods near the Third Street shopping area, has set up a virtually free parking permit program. It enables the single family neighborhoods to have virtually no cars parking in front of their homes, and it enables those in apartments to find parking spaces virtually for free. 

In the mean time, local merchants are having huge problems with parking, Third street is jammed with cars looking for parking, when easy and simple parking is available only a block away.

The solution, as I noted below, is to charge market rates for on street parking in the area.

1. They could raise the cost of on street permits to a price that leaves about 15% of the the spaces open. OK, grandfather in the current residents of apartments and as people move, hit the new folks with the new rate. As for the people who live in single family dwellings, I say let em eat cake. They have received a large increase in the value of their homes, due primarily to the location near the tony shops and restaurants, plus they all have garages.

2. The local merchants could then buy permits in the residential areas so their employees could park there, freeing up space around their stores for their customers.

3. Return the money raised by parking to the neighborhoods in the form of new services, sidewalks, lighting, and the like.


Picture of John Van Horn

John Van Horn

2 Responses

  1. JVH…perfect example of your post, same neighborhood. I wanted to have lunch last Saturday at Doughboy’s Bakery in the 8100 block of 3rd. No love, couldn’t find a place to park because the neighborhood was posted for residents only. So I took my business to PF Changs at the Beverly Center where there’s plenty of parking because they charge a fee to park.
    Same goes for the neighborhood on each side of Melrose, Sunset, and Hollywood Blvd. No parking…due to free or restricted status.
    Dumb. They’re missing a great opportunity to improve their neighborhood.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Only show results from:

Recent Posts

A Note from a Friend

I received this from John Clancy. Now retired, John worked in the technology side of the industry for decades. I don’t think this needs any

Read More »

Look out the Window

If there is any advice I can give it’s concerning the passing scene. “Look out the window.” Rather than listen to CNN or the New

Read More »


Send message to

    We use cookies to monitor our website and support our customers. View our Privacy Policy